Skip to main content
· 7/21/2003

State v. Michau

Citations

  • 583 S.E.2d 756
  • 355 S.C. 73

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding appellant lacked standing to challenge statute as unconstitutionally vague given the statute clearly applied to his conduct
  • concluding appellant lacked standing to challenge statute as unconstitutionally vague given the statute clearly applied to his conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.