State v. Martino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting state’s argument that “‘had [the] defendant made a timely objection, the state may have been able to produce the necessary evidence’” as reason to not exercise Ailes discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Reynolds
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-20· cited 63×
• State v. Inman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-30· cited 42×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
• State v. Gornick
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-03-09· cited 282×
• State v. Jury
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-20· cited 149×
• State v. Lovern
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-03-31· cited 62×
• State v. Kappelman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-08-04· cited 20×
• State v. Neese
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-06-24· cited 14×
• State v. Drinkwater
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-23· cited 9×
• State v. Morris
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-26· cited 5×