Skip to main content

State v. Morgan

Citations

  • 274 Or. App. 161
  • 359 P.3d 1242
  • 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 1151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exercising our discretion to correct a plain error in part because it \result[ed] in a restitution award unsupported by the record\
  • rejecting as unlikely the state’s contention that we should not exercise plain-error discretion because, had the defendant objected below, the state could have developed an adequate record to support the restitu- tion amount
  • reversing a restitution award for stolen sprinklers because the “evidence [could not] ratio- nally support the ‘particular amount’ of restitution that the trial court ordered” when the record was devoid of any fac- tual basis for the original requested amount or the reduced figure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrett, Lagesen, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.