Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Washington· 8/20/2002

State v. Neeley

Citations

  • 113 Wash. App. 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • possession of drug paraphernalia is not a crime under RCW 69.50.412, but use of drug paraphernalia to ingest controlled substances is a misdemeanor
  • this citation appears to correspond to State v. Neely, 113 Wn. App. 100, 52 P.3d 539 (2002), a criminal case with no applicability to estate law or TEDRA
  • the timing and location of the appellant's car, her physical behavior, and the drug paraphernalia lying on the passenger seat, raised a reasonable inference that she used the paraphernalia to ingest a controlled substance
  • “The trial court correctly concluded possession of drug paraphernalia alone does not give probable cause to arrest for possession of such items— bare possession of drug paraphernalia is not a crime.”
  • the timing and location of the appellant’s car, her physical behavior, and the drug paraphernalia lying on the passenger seat raised a reasonable inference that she used the paraphernalia to ingest a controlled substance
  • “bare possession of drug paraphernalia is not a crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.