Skip to main content

State v. Snapp

Citations

  • 219 P.3d 971

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellant did not challenge search under article I, § 7, but the search was lawful under the Fourth Amendment when the officer searched for evidence related to the crime of arrest
  • appellant did not challenge search under article I, § 7, but the search was lawful under the Fourth Amendment when the officer searched for evidence related to the crime of arrest
  • “Snapp challenged the scope of the vehicle search incident to arrest below. . . . Thus, Snapp preserved this issue for appeal.” Nevertheless, we affirmed because the officers searched the vehicle for evidence of the crime for which they had arrested Snapp.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridgewater

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.