State v. Needham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where simultaneous briefs were filed, the prosecutor never had notice and an opportunity to argue an issue advanced by the defendant regarding the adequacy of the police officer’s warning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lemmer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-09· cited 32×
• State v. Papadakis
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-05-07· cited 21×
• State v. Pederson-Maxwell
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-12-05· cited 12×
• State v. Goebel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-12-24· cited 8×
• State v. Balduc
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-04-12· cited 8×
• State v. Medrano
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-06-26· cited 2×
• State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi Farah
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-09-29· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• California v. Prysock
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-29· cited 537×
• State v. Merrill
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-12-01· cited 321×
• State v. Andrews
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-06-06· cited 45×
• State v. Fossen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-03-25· cited 15×
• State v. Crisler
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-04-28· cited 10×