Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/26/2008
State v. Medrano
Citations
- 751 N.W.2d 102
- 2008 Minn. LEXIS 315
- 2008 WL 2520854
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the validity of the Miranda warning does not turn on the accuracy of the warning under applicable state law; rather, the suspect's right to counsel may not be linked to a future time after the interrogation is completed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Paul, Magnuson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 652×
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court· 1981-06-29· cited 537×
- State v. RiskSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-07-29· cited 41×
- United States v. Lambert David NoaNinth Circuit· 1971-05-25· cited 34×
- State v. NeedhamSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-08-28· cited 14×
- State v. CrislerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-04-28· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.