State v. Crisler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning that “a cryptic or paraphrased warning that deviates from the standard” can be held to be inadequate
• the court set out the four warnings required by Miranda and stated that if those or “their equivalent” are used, the police need not fear a later determination that the warnings were inadequate
• the court set out the four warnings required by Miranda and stated that if those or \their equivalent\ are used, the police need not fear a later determination that the warnings were inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ouk
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-05-13· cited 37×
• State v. Needham
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-08-28· cited 14×
• State v. Ortega
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-06-01· cited 13×
• State v. Murray
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-03-28· cited 8×
• Crisler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-08-09· cited 3×
• State v. Medrano
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-06-26· cited 2×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-12-22· cited 1×
• State v. White
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2017-05-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Oregon v. Elstad
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
• Michigan v. Tucker
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
• California v. Prysock
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-29· cited 537×
• Gary James Eagan v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1988-05-24· cited 30×
• State v. Butzin
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-04-21· cited 12×
• State v. McBroom
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-10-21· cited 9×