Hawaii Supreme Court· 10/29/2007

State v. Murray

Citations

169 P.3d 955
116 Haw. 3
2007 Haw. LEXIS 313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \the trial court must conduct a colloquy regarding waiver of proof of an element of the offense\
holding that \the prosecution has the burden of proving each element beyond a reasonable doubt\
holding that the family court committed plain error when it, inter alia , accepted a stipulation without engaging the defendant in a colloquy regarding waiving proof of an element of the charge
recognizing “the potential for unfair prejudice to a defendant charged with a status offense if the jury knows ‘the name and nature’ of the previous offenses.”
holding that “the risk of tainting the jury verdict with evidence of prior [misconduct] is of especial 24 ***FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAII REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER*** concern when the current charge is for the same crime of which the defendant was previously” implicated
remanding for a new trial because “the court did not engage [defendant] in a colloquy regarding waiving proof of an element of the charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Acoba, Duffy, Nakayama

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.