Skip to main content

State v. Wilson

Citations

  • 445 P.3d 35

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a colloquy was not required where the defendant's attorney stipulated to a police officer's qualifications to conduct an SFST
  • explaining that “counsel has a duty to consult with the defendant before making strategic decisions when it is feasible and appropriate to do so”
  • providing the right to counsel, the right to trial by jury, and the right to testify as examples of fundamental rights requiring an on-the-record colloquy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKenna, Nakayama, Pollack, Recktenwald, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.