· 4/14/2015
State v. Nofoa.
Citations
- 135 Haw. 220
- 349 P.3d 327
- 2015 Haw. LEXIS 72
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the introduction of evidence by the prosecutor during closing argument violated the defendant's right to confront the evidence
- only a meaningful right to cross-examination satisfies the right to confrontation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, Wilson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.