Skip to main content
· 4/14/2015

State v. Nofoa.

Citations

  • 135 Haw. 220
  • 349 P.3d 327
  • 2015 Haw. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the introduction of evidence by the prosecutor during closing argument violated the defendant's right to confront the evidence
  • only a meaningful right to cross-examination satisfies the right to confrontation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.