State v. Munoz

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 1895

Syllabus

Gross sexual imposition R.C. 2907.05 child endangering R.C. 2919.22 weight of the evidence impeachment hearsay Evid.R. 613 ineffective assistance sentencing review R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 judicial bias. Defendant's convictions for sexual assault of a child under the age of 13 and child endangerment are affirmed because the defendant has not demonstrated (1) that the convictions are against the weight of the evidence, (2) that Evid.R. 613, which precluded him from introducing inconsistent statements without giving the victim the opportunity to explain any inconsistency, was inapplicable (3) that he was prejudiced by his counsel's alleged deficient performance at trial or (4) that his claims of judicial bias were inextricably entwined with due process concerns for the purposes of determining whether he received a fair trial.