Harmony v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an indictment alleging sexual abuse of a minor from “1980 through July of 1988” was not impermissibly vague
• opining that \[a]n offhand remark that the `statute of limitations or something like that' might `come into play' is simply not particular enough to allow appellate review\
• opining that “[a]n offhand remark that the ‘statute of limitations or something like that’ might ‘come into play’ is simply not particular enough to allow appellate review”
• qualifying as a prompt complaint a statement made by the victim three hours after a sexual assault
• offhand remark is insufficient to raise issue; court must decide issue to preserve for appeal
• offhand remark is insufficient to raise issue; court must decide issue to preserve for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).