Ayre v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the purpose of an indictment is “to place an accused on adequate notice” (citations and quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that the statutory reference in a charging document “exists as a matter of convenience to the parties and the court, and thus possesses no substance of its own”
• finding that during the same term in which the judgment is entered, the circuit court “has inherent power to strike out or modify judgments in both civil and criminal cases” (emphasis added) (quoting Madison v. State, 205 Md. 425, 431 (1954
• confirming the circuit court’s inherent power over its judgments Chertkov v. State, 335 Md. 161, 170 (1994) (recognizing the common law limit on the court’s “inherent power to modify their judgments” in criminal cases “is now codified in [the predecessor to Rule 4-345(e
• trial court has authority to strike its judgment anytime during term of court in which order rendered
• trial court has authority to strike its judgment anytime during term of court in which order rendered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).