Skip to main content

State v. Muhammad

Citations

  • 868 A.2d 302
  • 182 N.J. 551
  • 2005 N.J. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a suspect’s silence, while in custody, at or near time of arrest, cannot be used against him
  • holding that a prosecutor may not use at trial a defendant's silence when that silence arises \at or near\ the time of arrest, during official interrogation, or while in police custody
  • holding that a prosecutor may not use at trial a defendant's silence when that silence arises \at or near\ the time of arrest, during official interrogation, or while in police custody
  • emphasizing that the State may not comment on a defendant's silence at or near the time of arrest
  • stating that the jury is not bound to believe testimony of any witness
  • explaining that a jury should not be able to infer guilt from a suspect's silence because courts \cannot know whether a suspect is acquiescing to the truth of an accusation or merely asserting his privilege\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Albin, Rivera-Soto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.