Skip to main content

State v. Muhammad

Citations

  • 2019 ND 159
  • 931 N.W.2d 181

Syllabus

The district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the recordings of an interrogation without playing the recordings in their entirety. The admission of recordings without playing them in open court does not violate a defendant's right to a public trial. The district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to admit evidence of prior sexual encounters between the defendant and the alleged victim.

Judges: Jensen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.