State v. Muhammad
Citations
- 2019 ND 159
- 931 N.W.2d 181
Syllabus
The district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the recordings of an interrogation without playing the recordings in their entirety. The admission of recordings without playing them in open court does not violate a defendant's right to a public trial. The district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to admit evidence of prior sexual encounters between the defendant and the alleged victim.
Judges: Jensen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SevignyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-10-17· cited 24×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-04-06· cited 24×
- State v. WangstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2018-09-25· cited 12×
- State v. PeltierNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-04-12· cited 8×
- State v. PittengerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-01-15· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.