Skip to main content

State v. Muhammad

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2244

Syllabus

There is not clear and convincing evidence that the record does not support the trial court's findings under relevant statutes or that the sentence is otherwise contrary to law. The record supports the trial court's findings required to impose consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and R.C. 2929.41(A), and the record supports the findings of the various factors required by R.C. 2929.12 to impose maximum sentences. Judgments affirmed.

Judges: Beatty Blunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.