State v. Muhammad
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2244
Syllabus
There is not clear and convincing evidence that the record does not support the trial court's findings under relevant statutes or that the sentence is otherwise contrary to law. The record supports the trial court's findings required to impose consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and R.C. 2929.41(A), and the record supports the findings of the various factors required by R.C. 2929.12 to impose maximum sentences. Judgments affirmed.
Judges: Beatty Blunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
- State v. Sergent (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-27· cited 162×
- State v. BrimacombeOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-30· cited 96×
- State v. GuyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-06· cited 19×
- State v. PriceOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23· cited 18×
- State v. HairstonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-28· cited 14×
- State v. HayesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-29· cited 14×
- State v. ReevesOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-13· cited 12×
- State v. IbrahimOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-25· cited 10×
- State v. FrederickOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-08· cited 9×
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-29· cited 8×
- State v. MaxwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-04· cited 6×
- State v. J.L.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.