Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/3/2025
State v. Muhammad
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1981
Syllabus
Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. A firearm specification and a having weapons while under disability charge does not violate the double jeopardy clause, as a firearm specification is not a separate offense but a penalty enhancement.
Judges: Boggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
- State v. FordOhio Supreme Court· 2011-02-24· cited 122×
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court· 2014-02-19· cited 101×
- American Fiber Systems, Inc. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court· 2010-04-07· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. American Subcontractors Ass'n v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-21· cited 14×
- State v. HortonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-30· cited 4×
- State v. Taylor-HollingsworthOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.