State v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he fact that the [district] court made individual determinations as to the appropriateness of the photos is sufficient to show a proper exercise of discretion, and that the [district] court balanced their probative value against their potential for creating unfair prejudice.”
• admitting Spreigl evidence as proper rebuttal evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Morton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-04· cited 42×
• State v. Pearson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-11-25· cited 36×
• Lundman v. McKown
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-04-04· cited 23×
• Sullivan v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-10-22· cited 11×
• State v. Dame
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-10-23· cited 8×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Spreigl
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-12-17· cited 368×
• State v. DeZeler
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-01-13· cited 123×
• State v. Eling
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-08-24· cited 55×
• State v. Collins
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-05-12· cited 33×
• State v. Swanson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-04-09· cited 30×
• State v. Friend
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-12-11· cited 27×
• State v. Gore
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-02-16· cited 14×