Supreme Court of Missouri· 5/26/1998

State v. Morrow

Citations

968 S.W.2d 100
1998 WL 261564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that charges of murder, robbery, stealing a car and stealing a purse were all sufficiently connected that joinder was proper
finding that appellant’s selection of vulnerable victims, both in appearance and circumstances, supported a finding that appellant deliberated prior to the crime
finding a venireperson’s hesitation and body language was a legitimate basis for a strike
“To preserve an objection to evidence for review, the objection must be specific, and the point raised on appeal must be based upon the same theory.”
court will reverse only if error so prejudicial as to result in denial of fair trial
admission of hearsay statements implicating defendant in a murder was not prejudicial because defendant had confessed to committing the murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

130 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Morrow

78 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.