State v. Morrow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Cole “is explicitly limited to the waiver of counsel”
• “[P]ro se litigants are bound by the same preservation rules that bind all other parties.”
• “[P]ro se litigants are bound by the same preservation rules that bind all other parties.”
• waiver of constitutional right to jury trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thorson v. Bend Mem'l Clinic
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-28· cited 10×
• Read v. OREGON MEDICAL BOARD
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-03· cited 7×
• State v. Haines
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-01-25· cited 6×
• State v. Pedersen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-05· cited 4×
• State Ex Rel. Maubach v. Sarangi
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-29· cited 3×
• Hanson Joint Revocable Living Trust v. Sliger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-09-13· cited 3×
• In the Matter of Marriage of Brinkly and Brinkly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-15· cited 2×
• In re the Marriage of McInnis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-20· cited 1×
• State v. Avera
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-11· cited 1×
• MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF McINNIS
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-20
• Noor and Chowdhury
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-11-15