Supreme Court· 11/30/1992
Missouri v. Parker
Citations
- 506 U.S. 1014
- 121 L. Ed. 2d 566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding in a postconviction relief case that “prejudicially affected” is defined as “a reasonable probability that counsel’s error affected the outcome of the trial”
- holding in a postconviction relief case that \prejudicially affected\ is defined as \a reasonable probability that counsel's error affected the outcome of the trial\
- holding that § 1983 preempted the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act
- “Once a full record has been developed, ... the factfinder should proceed to the specific question of whether the action of the employer was discriminatory”
- motor carrier exemption applied to employee who traveled only within state but who regularly collected empty containers destined for out-of-state bottling facilities
- “[The court] will not search the record in an effort to determine whether there exists ... evidence which might require submission of the case to a jury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
264 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1998-05-18· cited 2,797×
- In Re Martha S. Griego, Debtor. Martha S. Griego v. Raymond E. PadillaTenth Circuit· 1995-09-01· cited 404×
- James L. Bolden, Jr. v. Prc Inc., Formerly Known as Planning Research Corporation, and Robert CarverTenth Circuit· 1995-01-31· cited 333×
- Linda K. Moothart v. A. Gary Bell, Bradley P. Pollock, Bell & Pollock, P.C.Tenth Circuit· 1994-05-06· cited 271×
- State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-12-21· cited 205×
- Hamilton v. LyonsFifth Circuit· 1996-02-07· cited 178×
- Mary P. Durham v. Xerox Corporation, a New York Corporation Doing Business in the State of OklahomaTenth Circuit· 1994-02-24· cited 167×
- Cabrera v. JakabovitzSecond Circuit· 1994-05-05· cited 155×
- State v. MorrowSupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-05-26· cited 149×
- Betty ROUSH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KFC NATIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantSixth Circuit· 1994-01-27· cited 134×
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-12-23· cited 131×
- State v. WeaverSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-12-19· cited 130×
- Ronald ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1994-05-04· cited 120×
- Gaworski v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.Eighth Circuit· 1994-03-02· cited 120×
- Unnamed caseTenth Circuit· 1993-10-29· cited 119×
- Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux CenterN.D. Iowa· 1997-05-27· cited 119×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-05-27· cited 117×
- Ann Walker v. At & T Technologies, Dba at & T Consumer Products, Dba at & T Phone Center, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1993-06-14· cited 97×
- John W. Frandsen v. Westinghouse CorporationTenth Circuit· 1995-01-23· cited 93×
- State v. SmullsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1996-11-19· cited 92×
Other cases named Missouri v. Parker
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.