State v. Morales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Dean and finding that trial “court’s careful limiting instructions protected the defendant against unfair prejudice by ensuring that the jury would not use the statement for any purpose other than to evaluate the credibility of the victim’s testimony”
• quantity of prior consistent statements to be admitted is within trial court’s sound discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martin
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-05-24· cited 29×
• State v. Dewitt
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-09-30· cited 23×
• State v. Hennessey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-07-10· cited 21×
• State v. Warren
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-06-21· cited 17×
• State v. Fischer
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-02-03· cited 14×
• State v. Huard
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-03-03· cited 12×
• State v. McSheehan
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-05-11· cited 7×
• State v. White
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-07-09· cited 3×
• State v. Rogan
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-01-06· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dean
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-10-09· cited 16×
• Allstate Insurance v. Chatigny
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1960-11-30· cited 7×