Qwest Communications Corp. v. AT & T CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that order restricting party’s conduct and requiring it to provide notice and perform monitoring during certain construction activities was an injunction
• holding that whether injunction is effective for fixed period of time or is made effective only until further court order or final judgment is one factor in determining whether injunction is temporary or permanent
• holding order requiring party provide notice and perform monitoring during construction activities was an injunction
• holding section 51.014 of the civil practice and remedies code authorized interlocutory appeal of order that in effect granted a temporary injunction
• recognizing duration as “one of the factors in determining the character and nature of the order”
• holding appellate court has jurisdiction to hear appeals from interlocutory orders only when specifically authorized by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).