Skip to main content

State v. Morales

Citations

  • 232 Conn. 707
  • 657 A.2d 585
  • 40 A.L.R. 5th 845
  • 1995 Conn. LEXIS 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “we refer to these factors as the Asherman test”
  • rejecting federal “bad faith” requirement in criminal cases where police fail to pre serve evidence
  • relying on Swift in identifying common-law rights of criminal defendants to challenge state's evidence
  • relying on Swift in identifying common-law rights of criminal defendants to challenge state’s evidence
  • listing states and noting that only Arizona and California had, at that time, agreed with Youngblood
  • listing states and noting that only Arizona and California had, at that time, agreed with Youngblood

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, Borden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.