Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/26/2018

State v. Moore

Citations

2018 Ohio 318

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant's untimely motion for new trial without first holding an evidentiary hearing because Appellant failed to request leave to file the motion out of time and failed to establish by clear and convincing proof that Appellant was unavoidably prevented from timely filing the motion as required by Crim.R. 33(B). Affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Warren
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-30· cited 5×
State v. Lauderdale
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-09· cited 5×
State v. Bolling
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-04· cited 2×
State v. Wells
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-08· cited 1×
State v. Scott
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-12

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Schiebel
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
State v. Hill
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-08-12· cited 179×
State v. Matthews
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-04-15· cited 92×
State v. Tucker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18· cited 20×
State v. Gillispie
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-13· cited 18×
State v. Hiler
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-15· cited 16×
State v. Morris
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-31· cited 15×
State v. Golden
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-20· cited 14×
State v. Moore
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-08· cited 2×
State v. Moore
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-17· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.