State v. Bolling

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 4093

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant's motion for leave to file a delayed motion for new trial, as the record indicates that appellant was not unavoidably prevented from timely filing his motion for new trial. The trial court also did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's petition for post-conviction relief, as the petition was untimely and the record indicates that appellant was not unavoidably prevented from discovering the facts upon which the claim in his petition was based. Judgment affirmed.