Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/8/2025
State v. Wells
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2792
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling appellant's Crim.R. 33 motion for a new trial, which was based on newly discovered evidence of appellant's purported incompetence to stand trial. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hanseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- State v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court· 1998-04-15· cited 92×
- State v. TuckerOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18· cited 20×
- State v. GillispieOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-04-13· cited 18×
- State v. GoldenOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-20· cited 14×
- John A. Becker Co. v. Jedson Eng'g, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-28· cited 12×
- State v. McHenryOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-10· cited 11×
- State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-04· cited 6×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-26· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.