Skip to main content

State v. Wells

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2792

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling appellant's Crim.R. 33 motion for a new trial, which was based on newly discovered evidence of appellant's purported incompetence to stand trial. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hanseman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.