Ohio Supreme Court· 8/12/1992

State v. Hill

Citations

64 Ohio St. 3d 313
595 N.E.2d 884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

describing Hill’s moral development as “‘primitive,’ a level at which ‘one do[es] things based on whether you think you’ll get caught or whether it feels good. [T]hat’s essentially whereabout [sic] a 2-year old is.’” (alterations in original)
a suspect’s diminished mental aptitude “did not undercut the voluntariness of his statements or his waiver of his Miranda rights”
\It is also within the discretion of the trial court to determine whether a motion for new trial and the material submitted with the motion warrants an evidentiary hearing\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.