Skip to main content

State v. Montoya

Citations

  • 861 P.2d 978
  • 116 N.M. 297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant failed to preserve argument that state constitution provided adequate and independent ground for reversal where the defendant “failed to discuss or argue that any different protection is offered” by the state constitution
  • observing that even in the criminal context this Court need 5 not address a sufficiency challenge if the defendant fails to present all the facts 6 bearing on the conviction
  • in reviewing decision on claim of pretext, facts are viewed in light most favorable to trial court’s decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pickard, Minzner, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.