Skip to main content

State v. Saavedra

Citations

  • 705 P.2d 1133
  • 103 N.M. 282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of commission of similar robberies by a third person, where the defense theory was that the third person committed the robbery
  • holding that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to admit evidence that was highly probative on the issue of defendant’s improper identity defense and crucial to the defendant’s principal theory of defense
  • finding that improperly admitted evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction could not be cured by an instruction because evidence of the defendant’s guilt was not overwhelmingly persuasive
  • “The case law in New Mexico is clear and consistent in holding that erroneous admission of evidence of prior crimes of the accused is error, absent special circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walters, Federici, Sosa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.