Skip to main content

State v. Bolton

Citations

  • 801 P.2d 98
  • 111 N.M. 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that viewing the underside of the defendant's truck was not a search because the underside was in plain view
  • holding that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the undercarriage of his truck
  • holding that viewing the underside of the defendant’s truck was not a search because the underside was in plain view
  • stating that the consent was valid because it was sought moments after a \lawful detention\
  • stating that reasonable suspicion is necessary for removal to a secondary area absent traffic congestion
  • stating that the consent was valid because it was sought moments after a “lawful detention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Apodaca, Minzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.