New Mexico Court of Appeals· 9/20/1990
State v. Bolton
Citations
- 801 P.2d 98
- 111 N.M. 28
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that viewing the underside of the defendant's truck was not a search because the underside was in plain view
- holding that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the undercarriage of his truck
- holding that viewing the underside of the defendant’s truck was not a search because the underside was in plain view
- stating that the consent was valid because it was sought moments after a \lawful detention\
- stating that reasonable suspicion is necessary for removal to a secondary area absent traffic congestion
- stating that the consent was valid because it was sought moments after a “lawful detention”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hartz, Apodaca, Minzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Cyrus Jonathan GeorgeFourth Circuit· 1992-08-12· cited 156×
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-11-03· cited 109×
- State v. DuarteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-12-07· cited 81×
- State v. BedollaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-03· cited 72×
- Pueblo v. Yip BerríosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1997-01-30· cited 68×
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-11-25· cited 67×
- State v. GranvilleNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-06-09· cited 59×
- State v. GossNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-03· cited 53×
- State v. GranvilleNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-08-22· cited 52×
- State v. TYWAYNE H.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-01-29· cited 44×
- State v. BaldonadoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-12-30· cited 42×
- State v. RyanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-02-16· cited 37×
- City of Albuquerque v. HaywoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-12-22· cited 37×
- In Re Forfeiture of ($28,000.00)New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-12-22· cited 35×
- State v. CandelariaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-09-23· cited 32×
- State v. PooleUtah Supreme Court· 1994-03-04· cited 30×
- State v. PallorNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-05-31· cited 29×
- State v. GallowayNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-06-03· cited 28×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-06· cited 25×
- State v. EstradaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-03-19· cited 23×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court· 1987-01-14· cited 1,722×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 1,282×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,253×
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,012×
- United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoTenth Circuit· 1988-12-30· cited 381×
- Michigan v. CliffordSupreme Court· 1984-01-11· cited 346×
- United States v. Timothy Andrew Smith, Stephen Lawrence SwindellEleventh Circuit· 1986-09-16· cited 259×
- United States v. Milton HawkinsThird Circuit· 1987-02-03· cited 181×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.