Skip to main content

State v. Gonzales

Citations

  • 912 P.2d 297
  • 121 N.M. 421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that victims’ rights amendment created an “absolute” privilege against inspection of victim’s medical records by the trial court or subsequent disclosure to other parties
  • rejecting argument that victims’ rights amendment created an “absolute” privilege against inspection of victim’s medical records by the trial court or subsequent disclosure to other parties
  • “A general assertion that inspection of the records is needed for a possible attack on the victim’s credibility is insufficient to meet [the] threshold showing.”
  • “we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to prohibit Rachel from testifying as long as she refused to produce the disputed records for in camera review[]”
  • victim’s history of alcohol abuse may have affected memory, perception, or judgment
  • People v. Arnold, 177 A.D.2d 633, 576 N.Y.S.2d 339 (N.Y.App.Div.1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Hartz, Bustamante

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.