New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1/17/1996
State v. Gonzales
Citations
- 912 P.2d 297
- 121 N.M. 421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that victims’ rights amendment created an “absolute” privilege against inspection of victim’s medical records by the trial court or subsequent disclosure to other parties
- rejecting argument that victims’ rights amendment created an “absolute” privilege against inspection of victim’s medical records by the trial court or subsequent disclosure to other parties
- “A general assertion that inspection of the records is needed for a possible attack on the victim’s credibility is insufficient to meet [the] threshold showing.”
- “we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to prohibit Rachel from testifying as long as she refused to produce the disputed records for in camera review[]”
- victim’s history of alcohol abuse may have affected memory, perception, or judgment
- People v. Arnold, 177 A.D.2d 633, 576 N.Y.S.2d 339 (N.Y.App.Div.1991)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Black, Hartz, Bustamante
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Iowa v. Christopher Craig ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-08-23· cited 173×
- State of Iowa v. Jonas Dorian NeiderbachSupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-08-23· cited 135×
- State v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-08-13· cited 54×
- State v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2018-01-23· cited 53×
- Eckhardt v. Charter Hospital of Albuquerque, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-11-12· cited 41×
- State v. RuizNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-09-27· cited 37×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-01-16· cited 21×
- State v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2016-05-23· cited 21×
- State v. FamigliettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 19×
- State v. MirelesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2004-06-17· cited 18×
- State v. LunaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-06-13· cited 16×
- Breen v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-08-28· cited 15×
- State v. DemaraySupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-09-23· cited 14×
- Montana Ass'n of Counties v. State Ex Rel. FoxMontana Supreme Court· 2017-11-01· cited 11×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-04-23· cited 1×
- State v. Patrick J. LynchWisconsin Supreme Court· 2016-07-13
- State of Iowa v. Mark Bernard RetterathCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2020-12-16
- John Robert Douglas v. State of Alaska, John Robert Douglas v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2023-03-17
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. ShottSupreme Court· 1965-11-15· cited 740×
- Tehan v. United States ex rel. ShottSupreme Court· 1966-01-19· cited 593×
- People v. FoggyIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 57×
- Foggy v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 34×
- State v. RamosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-06-08· cited 32×
- Mathis v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-09-24· cited 30×
- State v. ArcherNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1927-01-06· cited 29×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-06· cited 25×
- State v. PohlNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1976-09-14· cited 23×
- St. Vincent Hospital v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-11-24· cited 20×
- Sanchez v. Wohl Shoe Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-03-14· cited 13×
- People v. Superior Court (Broderick)California Court of Appeal· 1991-06-21· cited 13×
- Hogan v. ZletzD. Delaware· 1969-10-24· cited 11×
- People v. FoggyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-11-17· cited 9×
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-07-05· cited 8×
- Salazare v. St. Vincent HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1980-07-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.