Skip to main content
· 8/28/2006

Baggerly v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Citations

  • 635 S.E.2d 97
  • 370 S.C. 362
  • 2006 S.C. LEXIS 290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting use of licensure statute to disqualify expert engineer as same would “clearly contravene Rule 702” since expert’s services “were being offered to a South Carolina jury, not to the State’s citizens seeking traditional professional engineering services”
  • “[Wjhile foreseeability of some injury from an act or omission is a prerequisite to establishing proximate cause, the plaintiff need not prove that the defendant should have contemplated the particular event which occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Toal, Moore, Burnett, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.