Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/30/1998
State v. Miranda
Citations
- 245 Conn. 209
- 715 A.2d 680
- 1998 Conn. LEXIS 230
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting common-law rules concerning duty to act in interpreting General Statutes § 53a-59
- boyfriend who considered himself victim’s stepfather had assumed duty of care for the child
- four month old child subjected, as result of defendant’s failure to intervene, to multiple rib fractures, two skull fractures, brachial plexus injury, rectal tear, and bilateral subconjunctival nasal hemorrhages
- finding a duty to protect live-in girlfriend’s child from abuse
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Katz, McDonald, Palmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-12-28· cited 228×
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-29· cited 162×
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-14· cited 158×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-04-16· cited 91×
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-15· cited 86×
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-02-08· cited 58×
- Davenport v. QuinnConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-05-18· cited 49×
- Department of Social Services v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-02-16· cited 48×
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-08-02· cited 48×
- Murdock v. CroughwellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-04-27· cited 42×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-07-09· cited 35×
- State v. CondeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-12-25· cited 26×
- State v. CrudupConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-01-27· cited 22×
- State v. VakilzadenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-21· cited 20×
- United States v. Rene R. Bonetti, United States of America v. Rene R. BonettiFourth Circuit· 2002-01-10· cited 16×
- State Ex Rel. Kuntz v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court· 2000-01-27· cited 15×
- Hibner v. BrueningConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-08-05· cited 13×
- Costantino v. SkolnickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-02-16· cited 12×
- State v. MirandaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-01-04· cited 11×
- State v. HocterMontana Supreme Court· 2011-10-11· cited 8×
Cites
58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,166×
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court· 1997-03-31· cited 2,070×
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,779×
- People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals· 1992-06-11· cited 348×
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-18· cited 261×
- Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-21· cited 248×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 214×
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-27· cited 203×
- In re Juvenile AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-01-20· cited 200×
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-03· cited 157×
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-04-05· cited 150×
- People v. StancielIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 137×
- State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-17· cited 133×
- State v. ChetcutiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-06-07· cited 121×
- Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-08-01· cited 108×
- State v. PundySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1959-11-17· cited 107×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.