State v. Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The state may rely on circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences flowing from that evidence to establish any element of a charged crime, including intent.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• mere possession of a tool consistent with tools used in the commission of burglaries is insufficient to support a finding that the defendant intended to use the tool to commit a crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Montoya
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2020-12-10· cited 12×
• State v. Hodges
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-11· cited 3×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bivins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-01-21· cited 172×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-08· cited 32×
• Tose v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N. A.
  Supreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 29×
• State v. Evans
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-06-02· cited 16×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-15· cited 11×
• State v. McAtee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-31· cited 8×
• State v. Ohm
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-10· cited 7×
• State v. Kelley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-05-02· cited 6×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-05· cited 5×
• State v. Moreno
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-01-12· cited 5×
• State v. Elliott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-04-04· cited 3×
• State v. Towers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-10· cited 3×
• State v. Embry
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-03-03· cited 2×