Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/18/2021

State v. O'Hare

Citations

309 Or. App. 357
481 P.3d 953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that, although the defendant did not challenge the correctness of Boyd in that case, “there are reasons to question that conclusion,” particularly in light of Stockert and Rapp
reasoning that there was insufficient evidence to prove a substantial step
reasoning that there was insufficient evidence to prove a substantial step
articulating the same standard in reviewing the denial of a defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal of a delivery charge
“The legislature has not enacted a statute crimi- nalizing the status of being or having been a drug dealer; it has enacted statutes criminalizing the particular con- duct that might be said to make a person a drug dealer.” (Emphasis added.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lagesen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.