Supreme Court of Vermont· 7/19/1985
State v. Miller
Citations
- 502 A.2d 832
- 146 Vt. 164
- 1985 Vt. LEXIS 381
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a conviction can rest on circumstantial evidence if the evidence \is sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt\
- noting relevant question is whether preconceived criminal plan existed in which defendant participated
- noting relevant question is whether preconceived criminal plan existed in which defendant participated
- jury must conclude beyond reasonable doubt that preconceived plan to murder existed in which defendant participated
- “Circumstantial evidence will sustain a conviction if it is sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
- “Circumstantial evidence will sustain a conviction if it is sufficient to convince a reasonable trier of fact that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson, Daley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-02-17· cited 74×
- In re H.A.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-01-26· cited 55×
- State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-05-07· cited 43×
- State v. DurenleauSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-09-30· cited 37×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-07-17· cited 28×
- State v. NortonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-06-27· cited 27×
- State v. DavignonSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-16· cited 25×
- State v. John DiscolaSupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-01-19· cited 24×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont· 2001-08-31· cited 23×
- State v. ByrneSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-15· cited 22×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-07· cited 13×
- State v. PerezSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-06-16· cited 7×
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-06-16· cited 4×
- State v. WilderSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-02-26· cited 2×
- State v. Francis L. LampmanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2017-12-08· cited 2×
- State v. DalySupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-03· cited 1×
- State v. Steven D. BourgoinSupreme Court of Vermont· 2021-03-12· cited 1×
- In Re HASupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-01-26
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,037×
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 693×
- State v. DerouchieSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-19· cited 68×
- Faulkner v. Caledonia County Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-12-17· cited 55×
- State v. HoweSupreme Court of Vermont· 1978-03-15· cited 48×
- State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-09-01· cited 36×
- State v. RollinsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-03-25· cited 34×
- State v. SettleSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-03-16· cited 32×
- State v. BarrSupreme Court of Vermont· 1966-10-04· cited 31×
- State v. BissonetteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-02-01· cited 29×
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Vermont· 1982-08-20· cited 29×
- State v. JaramilloSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-09-01· cited 28×
- Childrens' Home, Inc. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont· 1965-06-01· cited 22×
- State v. TatkoSupreme Court of Vermont· 1957-01-02· cited 22×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-02-08· cited 21×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-11-02· cited 19×
- Solomon v. Atlantis Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-08-31· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.