State v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “first element is particularly difficult for the defendant to show because it requires the probability of a different result, not simply a possibility of a different result”
• explaining that court has discretion in ruling on motion for new trial
• new trial test clearly requires court to evaluate quality of evidence alleged to be newly discovered
• motion for mistrial within discretion of trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-16· cited 25×
• State v. Jonathan Bruno
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-10-05· cited 22×
• State v. Webster
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-03-15· cited 20×
• State v. Schreiner
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-12-14· cited 17×
• State v. Lawrence, Sr.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-08-09· cited 11×
• State v. McCarthy
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-05-04· cited 10×
• State v. Charbonneau
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-05-27· cited 6×
• State v. Olsen
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-05-10· cited 6×
• State v. Heath
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1994-08-11· cited 3×
• State v. Wheel
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-07-22· cited 2×
• In re Miller
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-06-11

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mecier
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-10-12· cited 33×
• State v. Barrett
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1974-04-02· cited 28×
• State v. Robillard
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-02-28· cited 26×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-09-07· cited 21×
• State v. Miller
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-07-19· cited 21×
• State v. Potter
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1987-04-10· cited 17×