Supreme Court of New Jersey· 4/22/1975
State v. Miller
Citations
- 337 A.2d 36
- 67 N.J. 229
- 1975 N.J. LEXIS 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- adopting Harris v. New York as a matter of state law
- adopting Harris v. New York as a matter of state law
- if incriminating evidence is obtained by police through “psychological” coercion, it may be barred
- if incriminating evidence is obtained by police through \psychological\ coercion, it may be barred
- Clifford, United States, 271 U.S. 494, 46 S.Ct. 566, 70 J., concurring in part and dissenting in part
- statement taken without complying with Miranda rule is inadmissible in State’s main ease but may be used to impeach defendant’s credibility as a witness if defendant testifies
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court· 1976-04-20· cited 2,133×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-10-08· cited 338×
- People v. DisbrowCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-02-06· cited 229×
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
- State v. HartleySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-07-03· cited 191×
- State v. DeatoreSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-04-13· cited 175×
- State v. RechtschafferSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-06-14· cited 115×
- State v. IrvingSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-03-30· cited 105×
- People v. PeevyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-05-07· cited 97×
- State v. BurrisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-07-24· cited 86×
- State v. GoodmonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-18· cited 42×
- State v. VinegraSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1977-06-30· cited 37×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-04-22· cited 30×
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-11-14· cited 17×
- State v. SoneyNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-11-26· cited 17×
- Acken v. CampbellSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1975-06-24· cited 14×
- State of New Jersey v. Ebonee R. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2016-04-06· cited 8×
- State v. Malik-IsmailNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-07-16· cited 4×
- State v. RodriguezNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1995-04-11· cited 3×
- State v. FrancisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-05-10· cited 2×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-17· cited 8,792×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-02-24· cited 2,903×
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1928-06-04· cited 2,291×
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-02-20· cited 1,583×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-12-13· cited 1,397×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-03-28· cited 1,293×
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-02-01· cited 1,024×
- Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1936-02-17· cited 960×
- Robinson v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1973-04-03· cited 306×
- State v. SantiagoHawaii Supreme Court· 1971-12-29· cited 256×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.