Supreme Court of Minnesota· 9/2/1999
State v. Miller
Citations
- 600 N.W.2d 457
- 1999 Minn. LEXIS 592
- 1999 WL 681685
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “the ‘authorized by law’ exception to MRPC 4.2 . . . mean[s] that legitimate investigative processes may go forward without violating MRPC 4.2 even when the target of the investigation is represented by counsel”
- misconduct by police detective imputed to prosecutor who directed and ratified detective’s conduct
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stringer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-09-13· cited 43×
- Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining MaoSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-10-08· cited 25×
- Monceret v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court· 2000-07-27· cited 10×
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HerreraSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-04-25· cited 10×
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James M. BoxSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-06-16· cited 9×
- In re Disciplinary Action Against McCormickSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-08-22· cited 3×
- In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41755Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-05-23· cited 2×
- Finne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-08-06· cited 1×
- IA SUPREME CT. ATTY. DISC. BD. v. BoxSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-06-16
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Darron WareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2014-12-08
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
- United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer HammadSecond Circuit· 1988-11-29· cited 119×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-09-01· cited 110×
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court· 1984-12-06· cited 87×
- United States v. Jose Orlando Lopez, United States of America v. Jose Orlando LopezNinth Circuit· 1993-09-22· cited 72×
- State v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-08-17· cited 63×
- State v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-31· cited 58×
- United States v. Harland G. \Skip\ FittererEighth Circuit· 1983-06-30· cited 44×
- McCarthy Well Co. v. St. Peter Creamery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-08-07· cited 41×
- The United States of America Ex Rel. Daniel G. O'Keefe v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, the Conference of Chief Justices, Amicus CuriaeEighth Circuit· 1998-04-08· cited 36×
- Frey v. Department of Health & Human ServicesE.D. New York· 1985-04-12· cited 36×
- University Patents, Inc. v. KligmanE.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-05-07· cited 35×
- State v. LefthandSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-08-28· cited 34×
- United States v. Donald Dennis DobbsEighth Circuit· 1983-06-23· cited 31×
- Petition for Discipl. Act. Against WeemsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-12-15· cited 20×
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WeiblenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-04-28· cited 5×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-01-21· cited 3×
- State v. RoersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-08-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.