United States v. Harland G. \Skip\ Fitterer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Minnesota’s rule DR 7-104(A)(1) did not prevent a federal prosecutor from wiring a represented defendant’s accomplice for the purpose of surreptitiously eliciting a confession
• rejecting contention that where counsel had been retained for grand jury investigation, DR 7-104(A)(1) was intended to restrict undercover investigations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).