The United States of America Ex Rel. Daniel G. O'Keefe v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, the Conference of Chief Justices, Amicus Curiae

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Supremacy Clause considerations do not come into play” in challenges to local rules of a United States District Court (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding invalid, as not authorized by § 301, a sub- stantive Justice Department regulation authorizing non-disclosure of information obtained in defense-contractor investigation
• affirming district court determination that government investigative agents were subject to Missouri’s equivalent to Minnesota’s Rule 4.2 “no-contact” provision
• “[T]he Supreme Court examined the Housekeeping Statute and held that it does not provide statutory authority for substantive regulations.”
• “An agency's promulgation of rules without valid statutory authority implicates core notions of the separation of powers, and we are required by Congress to set these regulations aside”
• “An agency’s promulgation of rules without valid statutory authority implicates core notions of the separation of powers, and we are required by Congress to set these regulations aside.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).