University Patents, Inc. v. Kligman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• precluding defendant from introducing any evidence obtained as a result of counsel’s violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct
• precluding defendants from using information obtained through ex parte contacts that disrupted the relationship between plaintiff’s counsel and their client’s employee
• “The court is unpersuaded by plaintiffs assertion that Rule 4.2 shrouds every custodian, cafeteria worker and receptionist simply in light of their mantle as ‘corporate employee.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).