· 6/27/1984
State v. Wadekamper
Citations
- 683 P.2d 168
- 68 Or. App. 750
- 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “it was no part of [the trial court’s] office to accept a plea to [a] lesser charge and thereby frustrate the public’s interest in complete law enforcement,” where state represented at plea hearing that it intended to charge the defendant with a felony for the same conduct
- district court lacked jurisdiction to accept a plea where the initial information charged defendant with felony
- district court lacked jurisdiction to accept a plea where the initial information charged defendant with felony
- state is not required to negate statutory exemptions in charging instrument
- state is not required to negate statutory exemptions in charging instrument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillette, Van Hoomissen Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.