Skip to main content
· 6/27/1984

State v. Wadekamper

Citations

  • 683 P.2d 168
  • 68 Or. App. 750
  • 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “it was no part of [the trial court’s] office to accept a plea to [a] lesser charge and thereby frustrate the public’s interest in complete law enforcement,” where state represented at plea hearing that it intended to charge the defendant with a felony for the same conduct
  • district court lacked jurisdiction to accept a plea where the initial information charged defendant with felony
  • district court lacked jurisdiction to accept a plea where the initial information charged defendant with felony
  • state is not required to negate statutory exemptions in charging instrument
  • state is not required to negate statutory exemptions in charging instrument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette, Van Hoomissen Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.