State v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not understand why factors that relate only to sentencing should affect whether multiple offenses merge into a single conviction.” (Emphasis in original.)
• “The state may allege subcategory factors to elevate the charged offense on the crime-seriousness scale for purposes of the felony sentencing guidelines.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “[W]hat matters is whether all elements of one offense are subsumed within the elements of the other offense, and not whether other facts, like the ‘underlying factual circumstances of the crime,’ might overlap to that degree.” (Emphasis in original.)
• “[W]hat matters is whether all elements of one offense are subsumed within the elements of the other offense, and not whether other facts, like the ‘underlying factual circumstances of the crime,’ might overlap to that degree.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hendricks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-19· cited 23×
• State v. Unger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-10· cited 8×
• State v. Nunes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-28· cited 4×
• State v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-01· cited 3×
• State v. Crowley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-10· cited 3×
• State v. Cazarez-Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-24· cited 18×
• State v. Flores
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-30· cited 17×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 14×
• State v. Merrill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-10-17· cited 13×
• State v. Merrill
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-03-21· cited 10×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-22· cited 9×
• State v. Medley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-24· cited 1×