Skip to main content

State v. Oswald

Citations

  • 2000 WI App 3
  • 606 N.W.2d 238
  • 232 Wis. 2d 103
  • 1999 Wisc. App. LEXIS 1312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing circumstances in which, during the execution of a valid warrant, officers were permitted to seize items outside of the scope of that warrant under the plain view doctrine
  • “The Supreme Court has not extended Britt’s presumption of usefulness to transcripts of other people’s trials and we decline to do so here.”
  • “The Supreme Court has not extended Britt’s presumption of usefulness to transcripts of other people’s trials and we decline to do so here.”
  • “The Supreme Court has not extended Britt’s presumption of usefulness to transcripts of other people’s trials and we decline to do so here.”
  • potential jurors must be struck for cause if they exhibit “an intractable negative attitude toward the justice system”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Netteshiem, Brown, Nettesheim, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.