Hawaii Supreme Court· 12/31/2013

State v. McKnight.

Citations

131 Haw. 379
319 P.3d 298
2013 WL 6860774
2013 Haw. LEXIS 427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an error by the issuing judge resulting in conflicting dates on the face of the warrant did not render a search warrant invalid
holding that a judge’s error in misdating a search warrant did not require suppression of the evidence seized
observing that after Herring , safeguards of constitutional rights provided by the exclusionary rule have been largely eviscerated
observing that after Herring, safeguards of constitutional rights provided by the exclusionary rule have been largely eviscerated
“[Requiring that the defendant travel to an agreed-upon meeting place at an agreed-upon meeting time ensures that an individual is prosecuted only in situations where his behavior poses an actual physical threat to the child.”
approving the holding in Rippe that the officer’s request for consent to search a nylon bag under driver’s seat of vehicle was not interrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKenna, Recktenwald, Nakayama, Acoba, Trader

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

103 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.