Skip to main content

State v. King.

Citations

  • 139 Haw. 249
  • 386 P.3d 886
  • 2016 Haw. LEXIS 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that \[a] 'reasonable warning or request' is then given a specialized meaning that applies only '[f]or the purposes of this paragraph'\ (some brackets in original)
  • interpreting the “‘lawful order’ element” of the offense of second- degree burglary under HRS § 708-811 (2014), determining that no probable cause existed to support this element of the charge, and affirming the lower court’s dismissal of the case
  • finding evidence insufficient to support conviction for second-degree burglary because Hawaii’s statute defines “enter or remain unlawfully” as requiring that a person “def[y] a lawful order not to enter or remain,” not merely that the person be issued a “no trespass” letter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recktenwald, Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.