State v. Abel.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the judgment of conviction where insufficient evidence was adduced to prove an element of the offense
• “As insufficient evidence was adduced at trial to prove [an] element of the offense, we reverse the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (ICA) Judgment on Appeal and the [trial court’s] judgment of conviction.”
• “As insufficient evidence was adduced at trial to prove [an] element of the offense, we reverse the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ (ICA) Judgment on Appeal and the [trial court’s] judgment of conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Paris.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2016-08-08· cited 3×
• O'Grady v. State.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-09-27
• State v. Giugliano
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2022-06-30

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Eastman
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-03-15· cited 166×
• Coon v. City and County of Honolulu
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-05-30· cited 154×
• Keliipuleole v. Wilson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1997-06-10· cited 98×
• State v. Fields
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2007-10-10· cited 62×
• State v. Cummings
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2003-02-24· cited 58×
• State v. McKnight.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2013-12-31· cited 25×
• State v. JING HUA XIAO
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2010-05-25· cited 13×